Home  |  Sarah  |  Services  |  Blog  Contact

Monday, 04 Aug , 2014

Pancreatic Cancer: Deadly & Ignored – Please Help Get MPs To The 8th September Debate

Share this article

We need to get MPs to the 8th September debate on the shocking situation for Pancreatic Cancer patients. It's for the 97% of people who die within 5 years of diagnosis and the 106k people who signed a petition to make this happen. Can you help?

Thanks to over 106,000 government epetition signatures, a parliamentary debate on the dire situation for Pancreatic Cancer patients has been scheduled for 8th September.

download-300x224
Under-funding, diagnostic failings and poor treatment options have been a deadly combination;

  • 40 years ago only 4% of those diagnosed lived 5 years.  In 2014…..NOTHING has changed.
  • Roughly 9,000 people were diagnosed in 2009.
  • By the end of this year only about 180 of them will still be around. It is one of the most ignored and most deadly cancers.

Gaining those petition signatures was a Herculean achievement, but we can’t rest now and let the blood, sweat and tears go to waste.  Please contact your MP and ask them to attend.

Find your MP

Template letter/email

We would all HUGELY appreciate your help (Pancreatic Cancer charities, those with PC, the Purple Army of families and friends affected by this and anyone who might have their life destroyed by it in future).
This post “Why Not Add Your Voice – The Pancreatic Cancer Debate” shows you how very hard 100s of very special people fought and how much we can achieve with lots of determination and support from folk like you.
Tweeting, Facebook posting, emailing and everything else is very much appreciated.  If you are kind enough to help, maybe share this impactful animated graphic underlining the dire need for action.


Click on the image to share and for links to more about Pancreatic Cancer and available support


 


A little more than 3 months she died and there’s news she would have loved to hear. The loss still feels enormous, but perhaps, if this debate gets the deserved support, we can save many, many other people from going through this.

Sue Clarke


County tennis player, accountant, independent business woman, developer and interior designer of lovely homes, stylish dresser, superb cook (especially cakes and roast dinners), debater of current affairs, avid reader,  Archers listener, royalist, pig collector, sports fan (never got to watch my programs as football, rugby, tennis, golf, snooker, cricket were always on), lover of her gorgeous garden, word mixer upper (infidential conformation was a fave), Spotty Dog from Watch With Mother impersonator, set the world to rights over a bottle of good red wine-er, laugh til she cries at silly humour-er, comforter, badgerer, advisor, coper.
Brave and pragmatic beyond belief when faced with pancreatic cancer. Taking precious time out of a cruelly shortened life to help us campaign for more research and better treatment.
Died aged 69, almost exactly 9 months post diagnosis, with my sister and I holding her hand and listening to the dawn chorus.

January 1945 – May 2014

Any kind wishes are most welcome, but getting the debate the attention it deserves and/or a small donation to the Pancreatic Cancer UK charity would be enormously appreciated and may one day prevent other families going through this.

http://www.pancreaticcancer.org.uk/donations

They support patients and carers, fund research and lobby parliament to do more about poor pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment.


Opinion: Paying to play with our personal data – is it ok?

We’ve migrated from ‘Hot or Not?’ to being held virtually hostage by many of the digital platforms we rely on today. In the midst of that a new processing paradigm has emerged. Myriad startups want to pay to play with your personal data. Can this tackle on-going...

In AI we will blindly trust…

...and the architects, designers, data scientists, and developers will think we are nuts I've been driven back to the blog to talk about one very specific aspect of privacy, data protection and Artificial Intelligence (exchange for Machine Learning or Algorithms as...

Data Protection, Security, and the GDPR: Myths and misconceptions #2

Welcome back! This is a shamefully delayed sequel to my first instalment of security themed GDPR thoughts: Data Protection, Security, and the GDPR: A fraught and fuzzy relationship. Here I look back again over my pre-privacy IT and InfoSec career to spot things likely...

Where and to whom does the GDPR apply?

Yeah, I doubted my sanity going at this one too, but here I am, because working out whether or not the GDPR would apply in different practical and geographical circumstances is proving harder than it really should...for everyone. This regulation has been my almost...

GDPR – You’ve analysed the gaps, but can you close them?

  There is a critical gap for most firms: An inability to interpret and leverage gap analysis, data discovery, and mapping output to actually implement technical data processing change. This article is about the challenges most large firms are facing when trying...

GDPR – The Compliance Conundrum

There is one question related to the General Data Protection Regulation that will arguably cause more ulcers than any other: How much is enough? In some portions of the GDPR 'good' is straightforward. In many others we are asked to respect principles of fairness and...

Opinion: The role of automated data discovery in a GDPR programme

Do you have any online profiles or posts featuring those 4 magic characters: G D P R? If so, whether you are a business decision maker, IT body, security body, charity boss, employed data protection pro, or job seeking data protection pro (less and less likely), you...

When Business Culture Eats Cybersecurity For Breakfast – Part One

A four-part story of budget cuts, blamestorming, breaches and massive bumps in the road to mature security. Wild Speculation & IT Transformation Do you remember Nick Leeson? On February 23rd 1995 he sent a fax telling bosses at Barings Bank he was ill and wanted...

Cyber Insurers Dictating Cybersecurity Standards?

A run down of the key challenges with choosing and using cyber insurance called out in the last few months. It looks entirely possible you will have 'adequate' security dictated by your insurers, so it is your job to understand the risk based yardstick they're using...

There Is No Such Thing As Information Security Risk

Having worked in IT and Information Security for 13 years, I've come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as information security risk. There are just business risks that have one or more security or IT related causes. There is a fundamental and persistent...