Home  |  Sarah  |  Services  |  Blog  Contact

Thursday, 05 May , 2016

POLL: Who Is Your Cybersecurity Risk Owner?

Share this article

Who is viewed as formal owner of your cybersecurity risks? A poll for anyone in any organisation. This isn’t asking who should be risk owner, it’s asking who the majority of staff think owns these risks. [polldaddy poll=9408916] You can chose one answer, or specify your own. If you believe there are multiple risk owners, choose the role holder […]

Who is viewed as formal owner of your cybersecurity risks?

A poll for anyone in any organisation. This isn’t asking who should be risk owner, it’s asking who the majority of staff think owns these risks.
[polldaddy poll=9408916]
You can chose one answer, or specify your own. If you believe there are multiple risk owners, choose the role holder most people in your organisation see as ultimately accountable for impact resulting from poor security.
For example:

  • If a project has unresolved security vulnerabilities, and needs to go live, who is asked to sign that risk off?
  • If a team is working fast to deliver a digital solution, and argues they have to use production data to test it, who is asked to formally approve that?
  • Who do you go to for final sign off, if the business wants to sign a vendor contract before security due diligence is complete?
  • When there are insecure websites/user access processes/data transfers, and the business argues there is no time or budget to fix them, who has the final say on whether or not that’s acceptable?

Obviously this is a rough and ready poll, without the benefit of information about respondents, but that will be respected in the way results are shared.
Comments are also very welcome. Perhaps you think risks are owned by the wrong people, perhaps you want to share a justification for your answer, or perhaps you have a link to great guidance on the subject.
Thanks again for taking the time to click and participate.
Sarah Clarke
infospectivesshadowcropped
 
 

Opinion: Paying to play with our personal data – is it ok?

We’ve migrated from ‘Hot or Not?’ to being held virtually hostage by many of the digital platforms we rely on today. In the midst of that a new processing paradigm has emerged. Myriad startups want to pay to play with your personal data. Can this tackle on-going...

In AI we will blindly trust…

...and the architects, designers, data scientists, and developers will think we are nuts I've been driven back to the blog to talk about one very specific aspect of privacy, data protection and Artificial Intelligence (exchange for Machine Learning or Algorithms as...

Data Protection, Security, and the GDPR: Myths and misconceptions #2

Welcome back! This is a shamefully delayed sequel to my first instalment of security themed GDPR thoughts: Data Protection, Security, and the GDPR: A fraught and fuzzy relationship. Here I look back again over my pre-privacy IT and InfoSec career to spot things likely...

Where and to whom does the GDPR apply?

Yeah, I doubted my sanity going at this one too, but here I am, because working out whether or not the GDPR would apply in different practical and geographical circumstances is proving harder than it really should...for everyone. This regulation has been my almost...

GDPR – You’ve analysed the gaps, but can you close them?

  There is a critical gap for most firms: An inability to interpret and leverage gap analysis, data discovery, and mapping output to actually implement technical data processing change. This article is about the challenges most large firms are facing when trying...

GDPR – The Compliance Conundrum

There is one question related to the General Data Protection Regulation that will arguably cause more ulcers than any other: How much is enough? In some portions of the GDPR 'good' is straightforward. In many others we are asked to respect principles of fairness and...

Opinion: The role of automated data discovery in a GDPR programme

Do you have any online profiles or posts featuring those 4 magic characters: G D P R? If so, whether you are a business decision maker, IT body, security body, charity boss, employed data protection pro, or job seeking data protection pro (less and less likely), you...

When Business Culture Eats Cybersecurity For Breakfast – Part One

A four-part story of budget cuts, blamestorming, breaches and massive bumps in the road to mature security. Wild Speculation & IT Transformation Do you remember Nick Leeson? On February 23rd 1995 he sent a fax telling bosses at Barings Bank he was ill and wanted...

Cyber Insurers Dictating Cybersecurity Standards?

A run down of the key challenges with choosing and using cyber insurance called out in the last few months. It looks entirely possible you will have 'adequate' security dictated by your insurers, so it is your job to understand the risk based yardstick they're using...

There Is No Such Thing As Information Security Risk

Having worked in IT and Information Security for 13 years, I've come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as information security risk. There are just business risks that have one or more security or IT related causes. There is a fundamental and persistent...